MiniGhosty
New Member
ATA GIVE US OP STUFF FOR FREEEE!!11!1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tlachtga said:The "adequate contribution" is probably either 1 skeleton or 3 skeletons (the first tier).
I wish it would be 40 i.e. completing the pvp story. If not, I hope it's at least the second tier (18). Giving out leaderboard avatars for 1 or 3 skeletons seems unfair to me. People are making over 40 skeletons. To reward someone leaderboard avatars with 1 or 3 skeletons sounds illogical.Tlachtga said:^Tlachtga said:The "adequate contribution" is probably either 1 skeleton or 3 skeletons (the first tier).
Then it would’ve made sense to just do a regular leaderboard as usual Arse said:I wish it would be 40 i.e. completing the pvp story. If not, I hope it's at least the second tier (18). Giving out leaderboard avatars for 1 or 3 skeletons seems unfair to me. People are making over 40 skeletons. To reward someone leaderboard avatars with 1 or 3 skeletons sounds illogical.Tlachtga said:^Tlachtga said:The "adequate contribution" is probably either 1 skeleton or 3 skeletons (the first tier).
Usually, whatever the hunt is, the leaderboard awards are limited to a handful of people. Just giving out high stat avatars for making a skeleton is way too generous.
Yeah they should have said that in the original post but it doesn't change the fact that it would be unfair to give out exclusive avatars to people with just 1 skeleton while only 100 people on party leaderboards would get the same avatars.
Arse said:^Yeah they could've. But they decided to change it up and I'm fine with more than 100 people getting the avatars. However, I feel the requirement should be not just 1 or 3 skeleton. That, in my opinion, is not an adequate contribution.
Arse said:I wish it would be 40 i.e. completing the pvp story. If not, I hope it's at least the second tier (18). Giving out leaderboard avatars for 1 or 3 skeletons seems unfair to me. People are making over 40 skeletons. To reward someone leaderboard avatars with 1 or 3 skeletons sounds illogical.Tlachtga said:^Tlachtga said:The "adequate contribution" is probably either 1 skeleton or 3 skeletons (the first tier).
Usually, whatever the hunt is, the leaderboard awards are limited to a handful of people. Just giving out high stat avatars for making a skeleton is way too generous.
Yeah they should have said that in the original post but it doesn't change the fact that it would be unfair to give out exclusive avatars to people with just 1 skeleton while only 100 people on party leaderboards would get the same avatars.
-Angel-PrincessMononoke said:Of course ATA was going to come out at the last couple days and say you have to “adequately contribute”. That’s absolute crap. Good on you for making it seem like the entire team got it but now guess what...I bet only the top 10 contributors get it. So unbelievably annoyed right now.
Bek said:They also should have made teams random. You either opt in or opt out. I don't believe vamps are actually making more souls, there's just more of us.
Make PvP a 2 part event...
1) individual awards,similar to idol event with a top 50/10 leaderboard that shows players what they need to achieve rewards.
2) team rewards, randomly place opted in players on teams for rewards that are nice but not quite what leaderboard received.
I much prefer this way of PvP using only fight and dance and drops based on the opponent you chose to hit.
Work in progress, eventually they'll get it right?
I did say that they should've mentioned that adequate contribution shall be required in the initial post. However, that omission doesn't change the fact that awarding 109% exclusive avatars to anyone who just picked a team is ridiculous.Warmth said:Arse said:^Yeah they could've. But they decided to change it up and I'm fine with more than 100 people getting the avatars. However, I feel the requirement should be not just 1 or 3 skeleton. That, in my opinion, is not an adequate contribution.
Then they should’ve said so. If they give a vague response on how many we need, and then we suddenly need the max amount? That’s ridiculous imo /: We should be able to know how much we need to contribute in order to set time and effort into reaching that amount.
They usually try out new things. Hopefully they improve the way it's conducted in the future.KeMoNeYhUnNiE said:Then why even make it a team pvp hunt?
Considering the value of the rewards, I’ll be surprised if you don’t need 18 or 40 for themPrinc3ssMel said:What exactly does contribute adequately mean? I cannot get a full skeleton to save my life! So if I don't have one I can't get the rewards?