Undead Undergrads

Discussion in 'Past Events' started by ATAMarceline, Oct 9, 2018.

  1. ATA GIVE US OP STUFF FOR FREEEE!!11!1
     
  2. Of course ATA was going to come out at the last couple days and say you have to “adequately contribute”. That’s absolute crap. Good on you for making it seem like the entire team got it but now guess what...I bet only the top 10 contributors get it. So unbelievably annoyed right now.
     
  3. I can't wait the new upcoming event... And also the Black Friday too ~GLHF ?
     
  4. How much would an “adequate” amount of hecco souls contributed be?
     
  5. ^
     
  6. I wish it would be 40 i.e. completing the pvp story. If not, I hope it's at least the second tier (18). Giving out leaderboard avatars for 1 or 3 skeletons seems unfair to me. People are making over 40 skeletons. To reward someone leaderboard avatars with 1 or 3 skeletons sounds illogical.
    Usually, whatever the hunt is, the leaderboard awards are limited to a handful of people. Just giving out high stat avatars for making a skeleton is way too generous.

    Yeah they should have said that in the original post but it doesn't change the fact that it would be unfair to give out exclusive avatars to people with just 1 skeleton while only 100 people on party leaderboards would get the same avatars.
     
  7. Then it would’ve made sense to just do a regular leaderboard as usual 
     
  8. ^Yeah they could've. But they decided to change it up and I'm fine with more than 100 people getting the avatars. However, I feel the requirement should be not just 1 or 3 skeleton. That, in my opinion, is not an adequate contribution.
     
    Roleplay likes this.
  9. Then they should’ve said so. If they give a vague response on how many we need, and then we suddenly need the max amount? That’s ridiculous imo /: We should be able to know how much we need to contribute in order to set time and effort into reaching that amount.
     


  10. Then why even make it a team pvp hunt o_O?
     
  11. I would say that Ata should give all the members of the winning team what they deserve because it was not mentioned how it would work.. Seriously, it's going to hurt to give people a nice ec avatar for once? Next time tell the audience the deal instead of misleading us !!!
     


  12. Exactly
     
  13. They also should have made teams random. You either opt in or opt out. I don't believe vamps are actually making more souls, there's just more of us.

    Make PvP a 2 part event...

    1) individual awards,similar to idol event with a top 50/10 leaderboard that shows players what they need to achieve rewards.
    2) team rewards, randomly place opted in players on teams for rewards that are nice but not quite what leaderboard received.

    I much prefer this way of PvP using only fight and dance and drops based on the opponent you chose to hit.

    Work in progress, eventually they'll get it right?
     

  14. This is a cool idea to be honest. Maybe they’ll listen...
     
  15. I did say that they should've mentioned that adequate contribution shall be required in the initial post. However, that omission doesn't change the fact that awarding 109% exclusive avatars to anyone who just picked a team is ridiculous.
    They usually try out new things. Hopefully they improve the way it's conducted in the future.
     
    Roleplay likes this.
  16. I feel like for all the hassle of this hunt anyone who’s made the effort should get SOME kind of reward, to be fair

    On a side note, anyone have an easier way to find targets with a decent amount of drops? I scroll through my BL for hours just tryna find someone with a decent payoff, most only have 50 heccos and drop 2 per hit
     
  17. What exactly does contribute adequately mean? I cannot get a full skeleton to save my life! So if I don't have one I can't get the rewards? 
     
  18. Considering the value of the rewards, I’ll be surprised if you don’t need 18 or 40 for them

    Which sucks, but they are high value
     
  19. I feel like this one is harder than the idols pvp. Seems to drop a lot lower amount.