IT'S NOT BULLYING.! Wow, y'all are stuck in a mindset that she is a bully because she attacked someone in a game MEANT for attacking people If we were sitting around a table playing Monopoly and I owned most the spots on the board, and you landed on my space and you had to give me all your money, then would I be considered a bully? No. But you are considered one because of the "strength" you have in the game! "But you Are taking all the money!" So! It's apart of the game. Natie has worked for her stats so she should be able to use them! That's the point of the game. ATA made this game so you could upgrade and attack people. By upgrading you make it easier to attack people.
She uses them every time she hits her farm and gets the increased plunder. Using your stats to stop free market from taking its course isn't acceptable.
Why does it need to be in the ToU not to do it? Highest bidder keeps the tutor not highest stats, as somebody else said previously.
There just needs to be a separate forum where Blockey can post his wisdom.. everyone just listen to him lol..... I am so fucking sick of people getting all bent out of shape over tutors-- quit fucking whining..... and now we have a case where she is attacking someone for hiring a tut.. Yes Hermes, the game is made to attack people, but this is for the wrong reason, the game has developed and there is etiquette involved in this game now in a way. I'm not saying she's a bully, I'm not saying she's a bad person-she may very well be a nice person.. but it's just wrong to flip out over someone rehiring a tut and coming to the decision that it's ok to attack them over it... Hermes your point is that it's part of the game to attack people, well I seem to be the only person that has a clue that hiring tuts is as well, it's a free market... if a tut gets hired from u, deal with it.. don't go all bonkers and attack people over it and spam their wall with hate/whine messages.... that's all
I believe in free market But, you need to remember that you need to accept the consequences. Remember, I have the freedom to go down to the mall and curse them out (I wouldn't, I don't swear, but I have that freedom), but I need to accept the consequences. Just cause you have the freedom to do something doesn't mean there won't be consequences
I never once said that you couldnt hire anyones tut. I said that you need to deal with consequences of your decision. Natie was not wrong in attacking, but op flipping out over attacking was bad
Day was in war she did nothing and you better realise that it's a war / battle game some people are so stupid
it doesn't matter if she in war in this case! I do think that u shouldn't hire someone's tuts while they are in war, that's just part of the etiquette I spoke of... but she hired the while she was in war and it got hired back, that's perfectly fine
to argue over a tut is just ... idk, funny? if you're in a war prep u hv a few hrs,or so, to get another tutor
Lol 1. I never hire a tut unless I check if they are active and I check with the owner and get proof on my wall that it was okay. 2. I have been farmed before and I don't complain about it because it is apart of the game. 3. She was only hit 4 times, not farmed.
I go ahead and hire any tut I like, whether the original pupil likes it or not... I just don't hire during the pupil's war
Blockey seems to always have the most maturity in these things, so I agree with Chaos and Gray lol