SHOULD THE DEATH PENALTY BE THROW OUT OR KEPT??

Actually, not everyone believes in the bible.

So using the bible in a debate such as this is kind of useless.
Although everyone is entitled to their opinions.

 

Bible is gd if you use it right. Read up on it before you try to use it Webby. Don't get mad when someone can show you differently. That's all you showed.

 

Honestly, I could report you for anything, I could say I saw you kill a person and you would get a death sentence even though it wasn't you, that seems like it's going to work

 

You'll never know for sure anyone did anything. Even a polygraph test can be wrong sometimes.

 

Letting him breathe life in Prison will definitly teach him more of a lesson then death

 

Bleach thats not how the world works without proof you're word means nothing

 

Your*

 

Read up on it before I use it? I know more about the Scripture than you ever will. Forgive me for my pride, but it's very true.

Anyway, you said something about showing me differently? What's that about?

 

It's whoever has the greater people, people listen to the ones who have the greater amounts of people, and besides, your life will never get any better if you kill the person who killed that person

 

Bleach...

No. Just no.

Simply saying you saw me murder Angel won't be enough to put me on death row dear. There has to be cold, hard evidence.

 

Whatever that meant...

 

Bleach youre an idiot. Straight up. Its obvious real life hasnt yet smacked you in the face with an experience yet.


To everyone else with common sense,I missed how religion got brought up so ima backtrack a few pages brb

Scuds

 

Even if 10,000 people said that I killed Angel, that wouldn't do much without evidence.

 

I think death penalty should throw off

 

Agreed

 

Death sentences were handed out back then for almost anything. I could say you raped a child and I could also make it so the child I say that has been raped does say he has and death sentence there, sad to say but that's how it works, you can kill anyone you hate by using the law against them, even if it is bad.

 

That's back then, this is now.


Your entire argument is invalid.

 

Still not true to prove someones been raped you need the rapists dna So again your post is invalid

 

Webby you showed you don't know all of it or you would of picked up on the eye for an eye bit and used it bcuz it is in the bible.

Now im not going to argue about religion bcuz we are not talking about that. But if you want to base your opinion off it fine. But don't be so naive about it.

 

So, even so however, it is still valid because the child will be there and that will be proof enough