Amanda , you are one of those people posting claiming us to be talking in a conspiracy style. Whether you believe this or not this stuff does happen. I do not know what kind of life you grew up in but dare I remind you that there are many corrupt people out there and some happen to be cops. None of these videos are fake, you can see it. Clearly. There is actual news about it. I'll admit, there are a couple of sources I roll eyes at. But this shit is real. I just hope it doesn't take until you get detained or arrested for no reason to get the clue.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2 ... -says.html While he was driving at a crazy speed and endangering other motorists and did say he had a gun...he didn't have a gun, he didn't fire... And isn't being shot 90 times excessive as hell?
"One of those people"? Define what you mean Dan because I don't get your meaning on that whatsoever And I have every right to give my opinion like you so if I believe that crap is fake then I believe it's fake. If you don't like what I'm saying then oh well deal with it but I just believe it's fake
The conflict in the case of the man for the choke hold. He was accused of selling "loosies" aka individual cigs out of a pack. Regardless it should have been a fine for that. Not a chokehold. Especially since he made no move aggressively towards the officer he was actually talking to.
So basically you do not believe that the police are capable of suck things as I've posted in this thread? You are calling it all fake, you are calling fake evidence that I've watched and you have not. Jo, define a forum troll for me please. I seem to have forgot what they are. Ahem. With actual evidence and footage, that you have not even watched nor listened to. You are still discrediting yourself. Especially when it's being talked about pretty frequently
Here I am, warning the public about the fucking shit that the police do, and she calls it fake. Opinion about fact, 2 2 is not 4 ? I have the right to an opinion
Actually, I was incorrect on one thing. The officer did ask garner to put his hands behind his back which he refused to do. And asked the officer not to touch him. However I still do not believe that warrants a chokehold. You can't restrain a man without such force? There was a lot of officers on the scene.
You know what man. Let her be ignorant. But it is almost as ignorant as me being against Christianity without reading the bible. I will just stay there to WHY I have not read it. If you wanna know? Sure I'll PM you later. But at this point, she has not asked me to PM her the source. So I'll call it trolling.
Jo, I think that if a lot of people are surrounding you then you'd want some space. And they had no real right to arrest him.
She doesnt have to see the source to have an opinion, i havent read the bible either and have no plan on doing so, i still have an opinion in christianity
Issuing a fine if you really deemed it that big of an issue would have been just. But they really had no cause for arrest.
Actually... I think someone SHOULD see a source before having an opinion on it. Just like how you right a paper or report. You should include citations and you need to know at least a little bit about what you are discussing before giving an opinion or else your opinion is discredited.