Years ago there was an 8 year old on here, joined the app and somehow found a club I owned and tried to rs me. Nobody came to her and nobody “groomed” her but she wanted to be rs and made up all these stories on how my rs wanted to leave me and all these lies, her idea of rs was actual dating so of course her messages were formed in that way. I told her many many times she shouldn’t be on the app and her response? “You’re not my parent” so with this topic you’re trying to parent people who don’t listen to irl parents ?
Even more recently I was in starter club there was a 10 year old, again wasn’t “groomed” and nobody came to her in a sexual way, she was told by a few people the rules and she ignored them, argued them, for all I know she still uses the app
Your ign alone is ironic for this topic of protecting kids from how sexual this app is, leading it to allow peds to thrive. You can’t really find a 100 member club without seeing a sexual ign..but yes darn ata fault
You bend the rule for current users who weren’t old enough when first joined, blame ata for not being ultra strict about age yet its users who are the issue here. You’re not doing any good with trying to control everything. Do you also wish to control the 17 users who harass others with sexual messages in pm? Why just protect kids? When this has worked just fine all these years ...
cUpCaKeKiLLeR said:
It seems a little extra to lock them out just because of their age. If they’re dumb and reveal themselves they should get silenced and banned. Aside from that just leave them be. We’ve all been young once doing stuff we shouldn’t do . Thus, No Support.
Which you even tried squeezing support out of, to benefit your message here.
In short blunt point, you wish to blame ata for not doing excessive protection and bend rules for friends and others to get a free pass, all in hopes to limit internet freedom for people in a society filled with sexual content regardless where you look. Ata gonna end up becoming the government of North Korea and other countries that limit internet access to things just because people can’t follow rules
? it’s great you wish to help and I’m all for protecting kids from peds, in the right setting and delivery. Which is in no way this.