LIMITED-TIME CONTENT 🌄 Mauve March 🌄

C

giphy.gif

🎵 I'm Cozy 🎵

Avatars


coinheader1.jpg

coinavatar1.jpg

coinheader2.jpg

coinavatar2.jpg

coinheader3.jpg

coinavatar3.jpg



Items


items.jpg

Cozy Cocoa
combo1.png

stat-item.jpg

Snuggly Scarf
combo2.png

stat-item.jpg

Macaron Mat
combo3.png

stat-item.jpg

Purrrcy the Plushie
combo4.png

stat-item.jpg

Collect 5 of each to have them automatically combine into...
Perfectly Toasty Purrrcy
combo5.png

stat-combo.jpg


Available through March Timer Boxes and from the Prize Spinner until April 1st, 2025 at 11pm PST!


Furniture


furni2.jpg

furni1.jpg

Timer Box


box.png


March Timer Boxes have a chance to drop:
☞ March Spinner Items
☞ March Avatars
☞ ✨Avatar Coins✨

This timer box will be available until 11pm PST on April 1st, 2025, as is tradition.

Our New PIMD Web Store



avatarcoin.jpg


If you're looking to get your hands on the best deals for Avatar Coins, come check out our new PIMD web store!
PS. 5% off EVERYTHING and choose any payment method you want! We got you fam 🤗


giphy.gif

mimimimimimi
Can we please go back to having 3 female and 3 male avis? This is quite literally sexism and discrimination. I understand there are more female players and they are the ones that spend more but please give us the guys something to be excited for as well
 
when they offered more than 2 male Avis in the beginning of Monthly Avatars, they weren’t as popular as purchases among men. Why is ATA going to waste time designing Avis if they won’t be bought? Waste of time and money when they know females are more likely to play this game and purchase cute avatars and dorm items.
You’re argument is redundant as by giving males only two
Options they further decrease sales by the male player base, they increase dislike from their male player base decreasing sales and player activity; and if they actually put effort into their male Avis like they do with their female Avis which is very apparent then it wouldn’t be an issue in the first place
 
You’re argument is redundant as by giving males only two
Options they further decrease sales by the male player base, they increase dislike from their male player base decreasing sales and player activity; and if they actually put effort into their male Avis like they do with their female Avis which is very apparent then it wouldn’t be an issue in the first place
Or, and perhaps you really spent no time considering it, the sales data for the current model still reflects higher sales than all the months where three male avis were offered. They’ve been following this format (4 fem, 2 masc) for two years now. If they saw re-implementing the third male avi as feasible, they would have done it by now. Either way, we don’t have sales figures to justify one argument or the other beyond ATA’s lack of response every month someone posts demanding a third male avi.
 
Still wondering what boxes the furni are in... Despite half of it looking recycled, there are a couple pieces I'd like to get.
 
Or, and perhaps you really spent no time considering it, the sales data for the current model still reflects higher sales than all the months where three male avis were offered. They’ve been following this format (4 fem, 2 masc) for two years now. If they saw re-implementing the third male avi as feasible, they would have done it by now. Either way, we don’t have sales figures to justify one argument or the other beyond ATA’s lack of response every month someone posts demanding a third male avi.
Whatever you say, sounds like you just want to defend ata lmao no point in continuing a discussion with someone who just wants to argue and be right; bye
 
Whatever you say, sounds like you just want to defend ata lmao no point in continuing a discussion with someone who just wants to argue and be right; bye
Weak. You couldn’t come up with a single response to anything I said. Hard to be wrong when the other person brings nothing to the table.
 
Whatever you say, sounds like you just want to defend ata lmao no point in continuing a discussion with someone who just wants to argue and be right; bye
As someone who has been around this game for 7+ years and watched it evolve, it's more than just men not buying the avatars. I've seen ATA put out genuinely unique and interesting male Avis with good variation and watched men call them "gay" all because they weren't some basic buff man with a beard in some generic outfit. There's levels to it. They offer men variety and it gets bashed and/or under sells. Toxic masculinity is in part to blame for that, but ultimately I can't fault ATA for the decision to swap over to fem focused avatars since at the end of the day they're a business. Granted I don't agree with everything they do, but I get it.
 
Back
Top