heck he might be the reason his child doesn't look the way he wants. kids don't always look like their parents. they can look like others in family. looking at her picture, she wasn't a bugaboo. what does he look like? if one had LASIK surgery is it necessary to share? however it shows that he loved her beauty and not who she was.
I agree with you in that sense, Foot. But sueing her? Out of $120k? For not being originally as hot as he thought she was? Kinda fucked up on the chick and kid.. Even if the wife was "originally hawt" and the kid good looking, he doesn't deserve to have testicles.
some things are obsolete. they shouldn't have any bearings on a relationship. also as a child you're still growing and developing. that child may end up being very beautiful.
They are rich and they are in a country that specializes in cosmetic surgery so why dont they do it on their children.. The girl did lie in a way..
I'm reminded of the way Henry VIII blamed his wives for not giving him sons when evidence suggests he had a medical condition meaning that he couldn't produce sons.....
how did she lie? his shallow ways is what happened. if I relax my hair to make it straight and my husband thinks I have silky straight hair, should I say oh just FYI my natural hair is kinky? My hair is actually kinkyno chemicals for me but should I share that on a monthly basics I use that creamy hair crack?
I would hope you are now allowed to give your kids cosmetic surgery, for superficial purposes. I have also seen a lot of ugly parents with cute kids, as well as good looking parents with ugly kids.
They have 3 children and every last one of them look like her original self. Now as a parent I will say Fathers have a different kind of "bond" to their children. The good ol' saying, "Mommy's baby, Daddy's maybe" comes into play. We carry the children and unless its IVF everyone knows for sure ur the Mom, but for Dad's its different, they dont carry the babies soooooo when little Johnny or Susie come out, Dad wants to be proud and see himself in that child too. Is he wrong for his actions? Morally speaking, yes, a parent should love their child regardless. But in a marriage, honesty and trust are key elements. His love for his children isnt the issue in his mind, its his deceiving wife. And of course a judge is going to rule in his favor because the law looks at facts, not emotion. When u marry someone and take vowels, u are saying them to a person u think u know fully and completely. Unless u've been married then this concept wont make sense to u. It all boils down to, she took a choce away fr him because she didnt trust him enough to know she had that much cosmetic surgery done. Lying by omission is STILL lying. Who to say had she told him that he would have loved her any less?? That was a gamble she took so she has to live with whatever consequences come with that. And again, if u havent been married and dont completely understand what it is to be betrayed by your spouse then of course he looks like a monster. He is angry and rightfully so bc his marriage may very well be based on false pretenses. U have to ask, well what else have u been hiding?? His anger towards the situation is displayed in a negative light but circumstances definitely make or break us as a people. Wouldnt we all be such amazing and outstnding human beings if we always reacted to life's situations with humility and grace. Its a jacked up situation regardless. It is probably so much more going on in that marriage than him questioning her fidelity and honesty. Go see the family picture with this article, only the baby in blissful ignorance looks happy because he doesnt know any better and has the BEST smile! We live in such a world where such things happen. There are many a parent out there who dont deserve to be called a parent, in the same way there are tons of deceitful ppl who dont deserve their mates. U never know what ur capable of until ur in the situation. Besides, the 120k probably came from his own pocket in the end, especially if they divorced and she got alimony and child support. Cheaper to keep her! Ask Kobe bahahahahahaha
This is crazy! I don't agree that he should have sued his wife. What will the poor ugly daughter think when she grows up? Also can't believe that the plastic surgery never came up in general conversation over the time they were together. It's all crazy haha
I think that he should love his child because it was proven that it was his. That's your child. That you created with the woman you love. How can you not want it? ?? And a lot of babies are ugly from birth. Does that mean you shouldn't love them? Is a child's worth based solely on his/her appearance? Of you think so then you're a crappy parent.
I agree with whomp . A relationship based on a lie (even a superficial one) isn't going to work out. It can kind of like if you took a smoking hot super model one day and she's great in bed and all that. But the next day when she takes a shower and the make up is gone she looks... Not so smokin. Kinda makes you re-evaluate the situation. Because in a sense you kinda feel lied to. Because you were. She's ugly. But eh, this is just hypothetical. But the point is we're all a little superficial when it comes to choosing our partners. If you're not attracted to the person you're with... A huge part of the aspect of "romantic relationship" is gone. So yeah he loved her. But in actually he loved what he thought was her. Which of course includes her physical appearance. What she really looked like wasn't want he fell in love with. ? It's like Shrek. And he's king farquad. He thought he married a princess but she's really an ogre. Now we all know we'd feel kinda played.
the relationship was a lie if he married her based on her physical appearance so unless beauty came up I don't see why it needed to be revealed. should men and women start asking questions about if you had any cosmetic surgeries years before they met? or anything that altered ones appearance?