If we had world peace we would be over populated and the only thing that could kill us would be sickness if not taken care of. I think it's best for no world peace. Live a little, kill! I'm so mean...?
History has repeatedly shown that we don't learn from the past and continue to make the same mistakes. While the "learn from the past" isn't completely false it's not completely true either.
I wish for and am in support of world peace. I donut think it will happen tho. Too many greedy peoples who want all the good things for themselves (in excess) at the expense of everyone else
No support. Impossible. Sounds good in theory but there would have to a huge war to wipe out all opposing ideologies before it could happen. And that's not good.
Peace is very beautiful, but can we appreciate it without war? Otherwise, what is peace without war? People will get bored, and want to shake things up. There's a reason why we have rebels.
Support. If all the countries unite we will be able to use our resources better and on the whole, there would be prosperity. We would be able to spend resources on more important things rather than spending so much to protect ourselves from each other. I would have to agree with Julie though, creating such a utopia is impossible and would have consequences and too high of a price but I guess that's not the question the post is asking
Why would there be rebels if things were peaceful? There has never been a truly peaceful time all over the world in history. One example of a peaceful nation might be Japan during the Heian era but since they didn't have a properly trained army at the time they were slaughtered by other countries
I did answer the question. I said no support to taking steps towards world peace. Then I told you why, steps towards world peace = ww3
Dammit you’re right...? True... my disagreement towards your response caused me to overlook the “NO SUPPORT” . Sorry Julie... please forgive my error.