You are missing the point buddy. There is no justification for taking the lives of innocent people. No matter the circumstances. A person's life shouldn't be taken for granted.
ARE U OUT OF YOUR MIND?? IN INDIA WOMAN ARE GIVEN THEIR FREEDOM..N BTW U ARE NOT HERE FOR SOCIAL CAUSES..IF U WANNA PLAY.. JUST PLAY!!GUESS U ARE WORKLESS!!..LOL
Its funny how ppl take ppl tragedies as a joke. Two thing is for sure No country is spotless. And all diffrences come from someones prejudices. If people stop looking at what other ppl have smoke a joint and worry about their own selves life would b so much simplier.
Should two? Three? Four? A thousand? The justification isn't pure, but when there is no other option, it is justified. It sucks, I know and I'd rather if there could be another way to resolve it. it'd be lovely if countries could've resolved their differences without taking lives, but unfortunately they couldn't. The bombs were not a bad thing, but they definitely were not good. They happened to be the best solution we had at the time, as bad as it is. Reality is, these things are a needed evil that prevented things that could've been much, much worse. Things like people being tortured for information, corrupt soldiers being deployed and exploiting innocent Japanese citizens, etc. I'd say america made a hard call, but a good one.
secretly rp's️ PS:Women are not given full freedom.Were you living under a rock ? Perhaps you should know more about the country.It is not the same everywhere.
So,somebody just got triggered because I said Pak caused the Indo-Pak war.So lemme put it simple for you •Jammu people wanted to join Pak •Jammu king wanted to join India •Pak tried to capture it •Jammu king asked India for help •Indo-Pak War •UN Gave CF Clearly not Pak's fault? •Pak tried to take over Jammu(Operation Gibraltar) •India tried to defend •US and UK supported India •The 2nd war •UN intervened,Soviet Union intervened •Weapon shipments were stopped Still not Pak's fault? •East pak (present day BD) wanted to have election •Had election,elected leaders •Pak army invaded,arrested leaders •India helped along with Soviet Union •War number 3 Not pak's fault either? Then who's fault is it ? :lol: I'm not trying to be biased, but those are facts.And I'm not blaming the entire country for it. And please act like an adult and stop overreacting.Farewell.
America finally got the president it deserves. I feel trump represents the country as a whole. You guys managed to shove a whole lot of ugly into one pumpkin coloured package.
Lets be clear on the real story, I have no idea where you got these biased facts. First the Indian subcontinent was run by the moghul empire which were mostly muslims, then the British came disguised as a company wanting to trade but took over the whole place. Now skip ahead of time to when Peolple started revolting against the british rule, the British wanted to extend their stay so they used the method of divide and rule and spread rumours to muslims about how India didnt treat them well and to Indians about how muslims were increasing in number which caused the diversity between them to end and to become two different sides. After independence, in 1947, they agreed to divide the whole country into pakistan and india separating them based on which area had the dominant side, for example if an area had mostly muslims it would become part of Pakistan. Even today Bangladesh which was full of muslims at the time became part of Pakistan. Of course during this time there was a lot of bloodshed from both sides but it wasn't anyone's fault. Now in 1948 they fought over Kashmir which was mostly muslims but India wanted to keep it for strategic and administrative reasons since India shared a border with China so for strategic reasons Kashmir which was also linked and become a strategic location and also had a mounatin range linking to the himalayas. Both muslims inside kashmir and in Pakistan were upset since this wasnt the rule they agreed on but India refused to give it away. Skip to 1965, and the fight for kashmir was still happening between them, then around August to September Indian Army started a surprise attack against actual Pakistan and hit from Wagah border and Different border locations near Sialkot. Since it was in Pakistan the Indians were defeated within 6 days and the war was over. That is the actual story, please get your biased facts corrected. And These wars werent the fault of a specific country, both countries were responsible.
Why are you upset about the truth? Like I get that you might be biased to India but im not blaming them, i'm just telling the facts as how they are and both countries were part of it, it isn't just one countries fault. Also try searching stuff up yourself, you'll clearly read that it was over kashmir and control. Like honestly if anyone is educated and reads your story, it's clear to see that this isn't true or logical.
You are a complete idiot "The atomic bombs are more a less a good thing" smh .. I think in 1945 when everyone was a complete moron like yourself that was the feeling , but 70years later, with what we now know, I doubt the same decision would've been made
Ikr, imagine how big of a deal it would still be if it had happened to US instead of Japan, would it still have "had to happen". It was tragic and you cannot excuse it because it was was and "the perfect option doesnt exist in war". That doesnt mean some options arent better or worse than others.