Regarding Relationship Feedback

Discussion in 'Past Announcements' started by pimd, Oct 28, 2014.

  1. No Support
     
  2. 1. Get rid of relationships altogether, then all is fixed
    2. Quit the cc hunts
    3. Update things that have long been awaited
     
  3. It doesn't enhance a thing. The feature is corny, as is your pretend concern in the lengthy fake chivalrous reply.

    Causem viduæ non judicaverunt
     
  4. I want to keep being single... But I don't want to have a disadvantage to other players who are in a relationship 
     
  5. As I stated wolfs idea of a "partner in crime" button. 
     
  6. The only thing I really like about it was the new gifts, and giftable ec ?
     
  7. I think what shocked me the most was ATA knowing that 2 of their games failed and they add this to one of their longest standing games and thing it'll "improve things."
     
  8. We aren't allowed to be "single" without being at a severe disadvantage no matter how much money you have spent. How does this make game play more enjoyable?
     
  9. I don't mind the feature.

    deffs works for the rp community 

    and for the ones who actually play the game also, we can team up. send each other special gifts and use each other's stats for wars and parties etc. I do agree it could be changed to a different name not relationship as that's what most people are complaining about..
     
  10. This is fine and dandy.. but what about the throwback avatars??
     
  11. How about you give people that don't want to be in a phone app relationship something comparable in stats?
     
  12. Is it for wars reply
     
  13. It'll take time to tweak
     
  14. I have a few concerns about the new feature. While I understand and can adapt to some of the changes which is understandable, a few things have put me off.


    First is how people who have given a lot of time and effort into building their character are suddenly knocked back in VIP ranks due to the new feature's bonuses. Now, people who have done half the work can get to VIP faster. This is unfair to the players who have stuck by PIMD all this time. The same players who have laid the groundwork for making the game last this long.


    Next is the message of the feature. Basically, you need to get into a relationship or else you're at a severe disadvantage. What kind of message does that bring though? Keep in mind, a lot of the players here are underage whether we like it or not.


    And lastly, the "Motel" bonus is really sleazy. In fact, the bonuses are super cheesy.


    This is why I suggested having it all rebranded into something else. Being in a relationship in college is not that important, having social ties is. Or the actual studying bit. Since this is a college themed game, we could have features with Courses and fun education.

    I dunno, it just hurts me to see so many great players leaving and a lot pretty much unwilling but were forced to because a relationship button compromised their values with existing relationships outside the game.


    I just hope we get to take a step back from all of this and figure it out and go with what's really important and fun.
     
  15. Agreed Wolf. I personally have dropped from around 100 in tuts to now over 1000 because I refuse to click "ask out" ... it's a little silly to me and my days here are numbered
     
  16. Matts page 3 post sums it up in 3 steps ATA! Look at it
     
  17. First pros came out, only the big clubs could complete them, leaving the smaller clubs and players out.

    Then the hunts started and again smaller clubs which can't complete the parties fast enough are left out. Even in big clubs I rarely get top awards.

    Next was Cat Cafe etc, unless you wanted to spend money you were stuck waiting for those elusive drops.
    Now the relationship option, which I get what you are saying about trying something new, but it's become a 'who can snag the best catch' to be able to pvp or war. Again smaller players and those who can't get the biggest partner are left out.
    You've shown where the alliances are... with those with money.
     
  18. I agree too

    And Devs, thanks for straight up make a thread about this. Even tho you took your time.


    How about next time

    You calm the players down a bit more quickly when you see a lot of negative feedback

    And see how you can tweak it a bit

    Talk to us?
    We're players not creators we know but atleast we can give you ideas on what we like and what not.


    Thanks tho