C *colinaidas (01) New Member May 7, 2012 #102 And ultra impressive your now at medium I'll post a new question tomorrow
T the_destroyer New Member May 7, 2012 #103 Assuming there was a third world war what would the six major players in it be and how would it most likely go explain your reasoning?
Assuming there was a third world war what would the six major players in it be and how would it most likely go explain your reasoning?
I inactive4161501 New Member May 7, 2012 #105 Uk (Cos we like to war) Us (Same Reason) China (They're rich and have a big population) Germany (Also like to war) France (Will probably be invaded) Mexico (They'll supply the taco's)
Uk (Cos we like to war) Us (Same Reason) China (They're rich and have a big population) Germany (Also like to war) France (Will probably be invaded) Mexico (They'll supply the taco's)
T the_destroyer New Member May 7, 2012 #106 You got four out of the six right and forgot the way it would most likely turn out
I inactive4161501 New Member May 7, 2012 #108 Ah. Uk and Us would ally with France. They would capture Mexico for the Taco's and would defeat China and Germany
Ah. Uk and Us would ally with France. They would capture Mexico for the Taco's and would defeat China and Germany
T the_destroyer New Member May 7, 2012 #109 Nope because France and Mexico would not be major players in a war think strategically as in soldiers skill fighting prowess and history
Nope because France and Mexico would not be major players in a war think strategically as in soldiers skill fighting prowess and history
T the_destroyer New Member May 7, 2012 #110 Here's a hint one is near america and one is near china both are main land
T the_destroyer New Member May 7, 2012 #112 You got Canada but Japan is incorrect because they arent on the mainland the last country is in two continents
You got Canada but Japan is incorrect because they arent on the mainland the last country is in two continents
A -AC-blockey- New Member May 7, 2012 #115 Dude lots of millions is nothing when you're looking at worldwide contribution. We're talking roughly 100 million, to 70 trillion. .-.
Dude lots of millions is nothing when you're looking at worldwide contribution. We're talking roughly 100 million, to 70 trillion. .-.
C *colinaidas (01) New Member May 7, 2012 #120 You just said the missing power state the powers and the probable outcom