"Pride" gift definitions

Sense made
You sir/ma am/whatevs are born before 1995.

 

Having that opinion is fine, but please keep other people in mind! I personally hated not having something I could identify with. It made me uncomfortable when I couldn’t answer when people asked my sexuality, and I also struggled with gender identity for a while.

As strange as some of these identities are and as knitpicky as they can be, if they make that person comfortable, and if that person can explain if asked, I don’t think there’s any issue

 

Cant we just all identify as human and get it over with. Atleast that way everyone will be the same according to words

 

There's deadass people that identify as other species, I recall a picture of a guy that spent like 20k on surgery so he could call himself a genderless alien

 

I understand wanting that, but some people, like myself, who are seen as different from the majority like to have labels. There’s no harm in them.

 

@http. You are human.all humans are humans

 

I know that lol but even though we are all human, we are all different or have different attractions to some extent.

 

um excuse u
i am a BIRD

 

Attractions dont need names. Yal hear that guy who loves his car? Bet he didnt call himself a carsexual he woulda just banged that pipe and got on with his life

 

I m batman.

 

Not just simple attractions, actual sèxual attraction to people you would have the desire to mate with. Big difference.

 

So does beastíality fall into that category?

 

(Gross) kińks do not equal sèxual attractions/identity.

 

If someone prefers blondes, do they get a label? What about people who prefer tall people? Older people?
Oh jeez, then someone comes along who exclusively likes older tall blondes. We could come up with a new label to describe the intersection of the three labels we had before, or we could just say person that likes older tall blondes.

This isn't an argument against people identifying as something different, an argument against people being attracted to something different, it's simply highlighting that making up dozens of new words to describe things is unlikely to save anyone any time and will probably just frustrate people that didn't really care about what someone identifies as in the first place.

 

If people are doing no harm and find a label that fits them which makes them comfortable with themselves, and helps them find people like them, there shouldn’t be an issue.

That’s just my two cents. ??‍♀️?

 

An animal is alive, Not an inanimate object like a car, Some of the "Genders" include having BOTH male and female listed as a gender, As well as having NEITHER as a gender. If you classify as having no gender then how is that any different from "Mating" with a different species?

Not a kink of mine btw just tryna shed some light from a normal persons pov?

 

And I respect that, But you can't get mad at someone for describing you to the police as a "5'9, Regular build, Dark hair, Male" if you don't recognize yourself as a man