i thought the attracted to intelligence was something else? skoliosexual refers to being attracted to nonbinary genders, which is debated as being like... legit or objectifying
Someone who is skoliosexual is only attracted to people who are genderqueer, nonbinary, and sometimes transgender. They are not attracted to those who identify with only what they were born as, or more commonly known as cis people.
LMAO SORRY I MEANT SAPIOSEXUAL I WAS LITERALLY IN A DEBATE ON IF SAPIOSEXUALITY IS REAL WHEN I TYPED THAT and it's not real
sapiosexuality is just like straight people who like the big bang theory who think they’re super smart but they’re not
LMAO SORRY I MEANT SAPIOSEXUAL I WAS LITERALLY IN A DEBATE ON IF SAPIOSEXUALITY IS REAL WHEN I TYPED THAT I'm definitely attracted to intelligence
I identify as a chair and I'm sexually attracted to people who identify as tables. But only on Tuesdays. And not if it's too hot out. Do I get a new word/pimd gift? To be more serious, I find this level of classification wholly unnecessary. If I need a mini-dictionary to explain every permutation of what someone may or may not identify as (and when) and who they may or may not be attracted to (and when), at somepoint it becomes easier just to use plain English to describe it each time. There's also a secondary question of why anyone actually cares what someone else identifies as. While I'm cautiously looking forward to my first encounter with someone who identifies as an assexual religious deity, most of the time it's largely irrelevant to me what someone think they are/identifies as.