A 13 year kid can use google quite well. I'm sure there are people that actually are sexually attracted to both bacon and pans. People need to stop being offended by any crap and grow up quite honestly. If the devs are going to expose 13 year olds to sex, drug and drinking references as well as predatory paedophiles, joke references about people being attracted to bacon is frankly the least of their worries.
An orientation towards playing romanticism maybe. But not an orientation towards sex XD. Humans have never been Asexual. Maybe millions of years ago when we were amoeba or whatever we were Asexual. But any person who claims they're Asexual either has a horrible mutation, or are claiming to be of that "sexuality" in the name of Romanticism. Because this Asexuality is useless except for the point of loving romantically whoever you love.
A person can be asexual, many identify as asexual when they have no physical desire for either gender. Why analyze and judge something or someone over an issue you do not understand? Let people be and mind your own business. Unless someone is trying to smash your taco, slip you their hot dog, or involve you in their orientation somehow that makes you directly involved, let them be. If I cut you, you bleed red, I cut myself? Red. Everyone bleeds the same. Except Spitty, he may just bleed lava...
You whinge more than me. Did I directly effect you? Yes we all bleed the same. But some of our effects on the world are differwnt. I don't judge people on their skin colour or anyrhing like that. I judge them on their influence from what I can tell. And before I judge a person as a whole I judge their decisions and actions and if I try to judge them. I judge them on any trends in their actions. I am not judging any people. I am judging certain peoples' choices and actions. Notice I don't judge people based off things they have no choice about.
I am not whining, at all. I am simply stating that you are showing great ignorance in an area you don't know anything about. You posted a thread, and now you have to live with whatever people post as a comment. Saying that pansexuality and asexuality do not qualify as sexualities is being judgmental. How would you know what they classify as unless you were one of them. You have seen pansexuals themselves post here that that is their orientation, identity, and sexuality. It's like saying Agnosticism, Atheism, etc aren't religions. It's someone's spiritual belief. It's a religion. This is someone's sexual identifier, their sexuality. You wanna get butthurt saying "did I really affect you?" Think about that statement, do the Pansexual, Asexual, "baconsexual" posters, any of them really affect you? I'm sure kids are goin to be anymore influenced by someone saying "I'm -food item-sexual" anymore than the half naked Barbie/Ken doll avatars, the RP on campus, or even just a day at school.
But Asexuality and Sexuality are antonyms. How can one be the other? Pansexuality is a totally romantic creation. What do you think the differences between bisexuality and pansexuality are?
Asexuals have no physical desires, for anyone. This is their personal sexuality, the fact that there isn't one, it's their orientation. Bisexuals are attracted to men and women alike, usually appreciating each genders physical attributes. Pansexuals are those that are attracted to someone without recognizing their gender at all. They are attracted to a personality, or "soul" of you will. It's not a romantic notion at all. Perhaps it's the purest of all really, because they are attracted to what's more than skin deep. They may acknowledge this is a girl, this is a boy. But when it comes to attraction, it's not about body built abs or large bra sizes.
Pansexuals are fully gender-blind and also sexuality-blind. They give no thought to any sexuality. It is not a part of their consideration. That is like saying that Giraffes are oriented towards kangaroos because they're not kangaroos. By definition romanticism is stripping bare your views from sexuality. It is about love. We do not disagree. We just define romanticism differently. What you described, soul attraction, is the essence of romanticism according to my definition of romanticism.
"more disturbing... than... bondage" I'm offended. Seriously, it's none if your business what people are into. It doesn't impact you in any way. I'm sure those who said they were pansexual or piesexual or baconsexual were just joking. Don't put us Doms in the more disturbing group. Your kink is all right, so is mine.
I'm sure whoever silenced you for saying "I'm sexual" saw it as you trying to get thirsties to follow you. That's why you were silenced. /end rant