NOMINATIONS OF WHO SHOULD BE STRIPPED OF MOD DUTIES

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Skittles, Nov 11, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. No rules being broken if no names are being dropped. Thread just trying to push the point that mods should be held up to more professional standards then using powers to silence people over pettiness.
    Also I personally love knowing I have friends who support my ideas! And I'm all here for this one ?
     
  2. ️️️ we need to have a hunt where the drops are ATA help tickets ???
     
  3. SUPPORT 
     
  4. I think you've mistaken me for actually caring about the specifics on y'all's little drama situation. I don't. I'm not personally invested and I don't care to be. In fact, I wouldn't have known there was apparently a specific incident that caused this thread without someone saying there was a specific incident.

    But that also doesn't mean others here won't start asking questions about it. That's what happens on a public thread.

    If it's supposed to remain a private situation like you are insinuating and you aren't going to share details, then it should have remained private by not posting on a public forum. Help tickets would have remained private and gotten ATA's direct attention on the matter.
     
  5. I mean it’s a general post for people who have been falsely silenced so calm down.
    Let us rant and move on ?‍♀️ obviously people aren’t going to drop names and you say you aren’t interested then why are you so invested in this?
     
  6. I didn't say this thread was breaking rules. I was saying nominations (and thus a poll), aka the idea being suggested here, would be breaking the rules.

    Also, I agree that having friends support you is important and I am not against that. I'm just saying a few more words than just "support" and maybe sharing why you support the idea, besides the fact that you're friends with the one suggesting it. It makes your support seem more valid if ATA were to view this.
    I didn't realize this was a rant about silences, but that isn't allowed either actually if that is what this is. Threads that rant about silences get locked for breaking FCoC.

    I had thought this was just a community suggestion and was simply giving my feedback on it and then replying to people's replies to me. That's kind of how a forum works.

    I mean, I am personally upset with some of my silences and dislike people on the moderator team. But I have sent in my help tickets and either gotten the silences sucessfully appealed or gotten them confirmed that they were valid. And then I moved on.
     
  7. Muschi mochi macchiato whatever your name is I can't reply directly to you but sis stop sending me paragraphs bc I really don't care and I didn't write this so you're sending them to the wrong person sis
     
  8. Ok let it get locked
     
  9. I'm not sending these to you... I'm posting them publicly... this isn't a PM.
     
  10. Oh no it’s the forum police lol. Sorry officer I’ve been naughty. Yikes.
    You said you aren’t interested but yet keep replying. Move on
     
  11. Lol look if you don't like the concept of the post, don't read it. Don't even comment boo. No one asked you to be here and to throw your opinion out here. You don't like what is going on, don't acknowledge it. Your paragraphs are falling on the blind. Cause ain't nobody got time for that
     
  12. When ppl say they aren't invested but constantly send paragraphs ?
     
  13. GO OFFFFF
     
  14. What I said was that I'm not interested in the specific situation that prompted this thread. I am interested in building off of OP's idea, and even said that I agree with OP to an extent lol.
     
  15. You replied to MY post which means to me
     
  16. I think people are valid in having a reasonable expectation of accountability from their mods. No one wants to constantly be silenced for invalid reasons and asking for mods that take that seriously isn't an insane request idg why yall keep going back n forth on such a simple issue
     
  17. Not caring about the backstory of a thread =/= not caring about the content of a thread and providing feedback on the idea shared, which I was doing. "Bad" feedback is still feedback. Sorry I didn't just post a one word "support" like one of your friends.
    Replying to you does not mean sending them to you. It's still public. If we wanna get technical, you replied to me first.
     
  18. Imagine being so invested in a game that you know ToU by heart. Damn sis.
     
  19. If you wanna get technical I posted here first which means everything AFTER was a reply to us

    You thought that was it huh
     
  20. No it wasn't because I replied to OP. I didn't "quote" you, or "send" it to you if that's the term you prefer. All you said was "support" so there wasn't really anything of substance to respond to.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.