My Opinion on "Locked Roster" Wars

When my club wars, I don't want it to be my club plus mercs beating the other club, I want it to just be my club. And when I beat or lose to a club, I want to lose to that club, not that club plus mercs.
Makes sense to me.
 
I don't see your point. Not every war is locked roster. If it is, then both sides agreed to it so that there would be a fair war. I see nothing wrong with that.
I do not see as much complaining about unfair wars, which was the goal by that update. You just have to find one or ask on campus if anyone needs (and can have) mercs.
 
It's not about how many friends you have though. It should be about who has a better strategy/players/activity etc.

Keep in mind for every winner, there's a loser. Saying don't start a war you can't win doesn't really make sense. You never know you're going to win a war.
 
Ok. A sexting club challenged zeppy, who had started a new war club for our club yesterday. Presumably just for the giggles, he accepted and gave them a few slaps.

A club with the top player of 20k with 5 members take on a t5 lcbc? They really gonna win?
 
I get it but some ppl want "Locked Roster" For a reason, so they could see witch family is better without help, n some ppl like "Unlocked Roster" (ii forgott what it's called) to see which family will win with help, but my opinion is that there should be locked roster for half of war nd then you can mercs, cuz you know, some ppl dnt follow the rules..
~ᎠᎯཝརཕསས
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top