i mean op, ur not wrong. But once ur personality is garbage u look ugly no matter what kind of looks u got.
I'm more into Asian women and black queens... but yes, Latinas are in high demand and guys will give up all their money for them, even without any sexual contact.
True. I get confused about it, like damn, did I just bust bust or was that a figment of my imagination and why is money being taken out my checks for child support and who's kid is this and why does he keep calling me dada
That’s.. not how those studies work. Babies tend to gaze at what is considered “attractive” by society due to many of the features being common when making a standard, ‘normal’ human face. What people tend to find “unattractive” are features that may seem abnormal or off (such as things like asymmetry in the face). A baby is looking for what is biologically ingrained as ‘normal’ face. Even proportions, symmetry, etc. Society is what has made these labels “attractive” and “unattractive” instead of understanding what is “unattractive” is simply different appearances happening from a wide range of complex match ups while we’re first forming that result in these features. ”Unattractive” in society is simply something that may be less common or differing from a basic face or body that would be without any mutations, different genes, abnormalities, etc. That does not make someone “ugly”, it makes them human. That’s it.
No. The baby doesn't care about normality and hasn't been accustomed to a wide enough data set to know what normal is, and has no interest in either social or genetic norms. It's affected by the the neurological bases(objective ) of what we consider "arsthetically pleasing", especially symmetricality.
aesthetically pleasing images draw gazes and ATTRACT attention from people subconsciously from conception to death. You aren't immune, and saying you are is pointless, attempted virtue signalling, pretentious, and naiively stupid.
The baby doesn’t care about normality, but they still know what it is. The more naturally “attractive” the face is.. the more common and normal those features are. I literally added that they’re more likely to look at symmetrical faces, because that is a common feature. If you show a baby an extremely asymmetrical face with odd proportions next to a symmetrical face with even proportions, it’s going to look at the symmetrical one because that is the ‘normal’ face. Society is what labels that as attractive, when it is literally just what’s common. That’s my point through all of this. Selective species are wired biologically, from birth, to automatically look for ‘normal’ (common) features because that is what a species works towards having (hence why they’re common) because that is what survives. This shows in many other species, and it’s the same in humans. Look up the study done on this, please! I’m sure it’ll clear up a lot of this.