@Josh, I kind of agree with you but not everyone has the means to spend money on a game. I still think making drops proportionate to the amount of times you hit in a party is the best idea so far. I think LBHs would be happy with that solution too since they are club hopping anyway. Plus if they're spending money on DNs and ECs for unloads they're getting the same drops and working for it. Everyone's satisfied lol
Not everyone is going to make the top 200, it's supposed to be competitive and spending more money on dns should increase the number of drops you get from parties
Using DNs WOULD increase the amount you get in drops. However, it isn't fair to have a club do all the work for an LBH to come in at last bar and get the same amount of drops.
You guys are so naive....LBH: first off nothing wrong with it, notice when you go to join a club you have to apply? That club doesn't have to accept them, they choose to. By doing so that's Their choice, PIMD there isn't anything to fix.
I don't understand why this is even a discussion. Note the last letter, the H is for Help! You can't have it both ways. You can't beg for help, then complain about the results. Clubs can choose to or not to request the help. If last bar help stops providing drops, mercs won't help and clubs will fail parties. Then, the whining will start that the parties are too hard.
There is no fix for it and no matter what people will complain. If clubs don't like LBH then owners/admins should disable join requests. If you create something to stop LBH then you'll have complaints from people who can't reach the goal amounts. As creators of the game you should know by now that you're automatically in a lose/lose position to some people.
...H = hitter...what rock have you been hiding under? lol Some clubs can't afford to lock the doors because they need the help and I agree with you, the shouldn't be complaining about getting the same amount in drops as the LBHs. This is for the clubs that don't NEED the LBHs yet still call them. Yes, owners/admins can lock their doors but obviously they don't otherwise there wouldn't be a discussion about this.
Basically pimd u r not going to b able to please everyone. No matter what the idea is someone is gonna have a problem with it whether there opinions r valid or not. It's parties get locked on the last bar, then there goes all the LBH posts on campus. Nothing unfair about the way it is now. Every one has the same opportunity to b a Kast bar helper and make the same. So idk how it's a unfair advantage if everyone has the same chance. Unfair woukd b if other players didn't have the choice of doin the same. Bcuz someone been in the party longer they want a higher pay out or lbh ppl to receive less. How about don't ask for lbh then? Some clubs depend on LBH to complete parties so wouldn't it b unfair to them to lock parties on the last bar? Just sayin there's always gonna b something to point out wrong. The thing is to do what's best for the fresher good of the game not just to satisfy the few. Parties r fine as is to me. Just tryin ti raise a few concerns about the possible change.
I see no problem with lbhs. We all choose the way we want to play. If you want to stay with your club, stay. If you want to merc for last bars, do so. Stop complaining about it. Pimd trying to limit lbhs would just be taking away our right to choose our style of game play.
Clubs call for lbh...if you people wanna remove "lbh" like u did with sending gifts..ama get all personal and uninstall ... me n my friends actually
Sometimes my last bar hits are more than someone who's stayed in the club the whole time. Just saying. I'm not proud to be LBH during hunts, but sometimes I just don't have time to play all day, and still want to complete the hunt. Woohoo to all the clubs that let us hunt .
I still think having less hunts should be considered. Less hunts = less people complaining about drops! Also = better loyalty to clubs
Can pimd like weigh in again soon? I feel this is extremely repetitive and it seems as though this is split right down the middle between support lbh and kill lbh...meaning not even a general consensus.