Did that thread, also happen to mention me in his post? -_- Look man, you are glass. Transparent. Just stop, you've lost every argument we've had since I've started playing.
Then explain why, Des, do you always try to get him to notice you with your failed attempts at bashing him? :|
NIGHT NIGHT CJS! I can see that. If only she could learn a thing or two in arguments like this, then maybe she wouldn't have to resort to using 'jealousy' as an excuse for her failed attempts at arguing!! ^.^
Lmao Wow! Is your paranoia that consistent that you think *everything* is about you? Uh, reality check. It's not. It's like Chloe trying to successfully get into this conversation and switching from foot to foot because she's not getting the reaction she wants lol. I think I'm done lol. Enjoy your paranoia. I'll make sure to pull out my crayons and paper when I post in a thread illustrating why I commented what I did. As far as "unbashable"? You're not Superman lol. Everyone has their buttons, and you have them as well.
Conversation? And yet you have to fumble with your words, fit emoji and 'lol' into almost every part of your post, and you think YOU'RE successful with this supposed 'conversation' we're having? How about I pour you a cup of tea and chat about the weather? Maybe then you wouldn't have to go 'um' and 'uh' everytime you type. And the reaction I want? I already have it. ^.^
So.... I am completely confused. Des, what? I don't really understand what you are talking about lol.... I post 2 times about a certain topic and you think I am obsessed with it... Hmmm... And why do you always call my posts out? Oh! It is cause you have a Hermes fetish. Des, never once have I considered myself a legend. But i do consider CJS one. And yes, CJS, the one other time I talked about legends, your name was there. Lol. Des, why do you try? There really was no reason for that... In fact the complete randomness confused me. Now go back and rethink what you have said, and maybe next time you will have a better troll to try to take down Hermes. Because this one, quite frankly, was a fail.
Oh! Also point out where you replied to my last post about legends... Cause with what I see, you didn't.
Okay, here I come. Hermes, remove your glorified head from your ass. I didn't see Des say anywhere that "you" were a legend, or that you considered yourself a "legend". She stated that you have a fetish-like obsession with legends, seeing as how most every comment you post has either legend, active forumer, or CJS in them. I volunteer at my local library, organizing shelves. I could point you in the direction of where we keep the dictionaries. Maybe then you'd be able to read correctly.
Oh, and by the way, are we referring to ourselves in a third-person point of view now? Ari thinks that Hermes has a bit of fail commenting up his sleeve of his own, and that She doubts it would take much to take Hermes down.
I considered Des's comment on page 8 to be toward me since her main focus was to bash me and CJS. And since it was plural, it seemed logical. Now you please grow up. I don't get offended by anyone on this game, expecially by someone barely older than my nieces and nephews. You really have no part in this conversation. Now pl
Who the hell is drew? If he's not as popular as "the LEGEND OF ZELDA" is to gamers in my generation, which he's not, then he is no legend on this game. Your argument Against my legend of Zelda and games analogy is invalid
Must I bring up our encyclopedia section too? She was having an argument with Chloe and CJS. I don't see a Hermes anywhere in that list of names, do you? So, if I were to make a random comment "They like eating Swedish Fish. They must be losers", you'd would consider to be pointed solely at you, even if you were no where near the thread I had commented that in before hand? ._. You seem to issue the fact that you don't take "bashers" or whatever you call us seriously, yet you care enough to comment against every one of them. Oh, and you care enough to tell me to grow up? Aren't you supposed to be the mature one with all of the morals here?