If a feminist wants women to be treated equally the same as a man, then yes a man should have the rights to strike a woman in self defense.
Equality says yes you can hit back if she hits you. The law says no if you hit her back or there will be consequences. If anything just restrain her so she cant do anything more. Just my thoughts.
No such thing as chivalry anymore. If a woman wants to step up to you like a man, she should know the dire consequences of her actions and she'd best be prepared.
Hell yeah. I'm not gone sit back and let a girl hit me because "society" believes its wrong for a male to hit a woman. If she had the balls to hit me she got the balls to get hit back.
chivalry [shiv-uh l-ree] noun, plural chivalries for 6. 1. the sum of the ideal qualifications of aknight, including courtesy, generosity, valor,and dexterity in arms. 2. the rules and customs of medievalknighthood. Yeah i think chivalry is dead too.
The word Chivalry that is used today isn't discussed as a medieval term. It also means: courteous behavior, especially of a man towards a woman.
As with anyone. Putting them on the ground is the best and least violent tactic. If you can restrain them for long enough. They'll calm down. You can even talk to them and try to calm them down in the meantime
"I want equality as a woman" "but you can't hit me because I'm a girl" feminist logic ?if a chick starts something she should be able to handle what's coming to her
If it's in self defense, it doesn't matter whether you're a man or a woman. If you honestly feel threatened and believe that there's no other way to protect yourself, then I believe it doesn't matter whether someone is male or female.
I agree. No one should "lose their cool" enough to put their hands on another person. Situational or not idc if the guy is cheating on her if she hits him she is no lady herself. And yes like Spite said don't knock the girl out but slap her back, it isn't acceptable for women to just willy nilly slap/punch or whatever to men just because they are women and they think they can. (Coming from a woman <3)
depends. if she's like willing to hit me and fight etc, generally trying to hurt me, I'll fight back :? I don't see it as equality, I just see it as "you hit me, I hit you" :?
They shouldn't hit back they should use their words, power of speech peeps I mean really what will it do? make it worse....yeah or maybe you will get punched again, there is no benefit truly.
The issue with "men shouldn't hit women" is that in a lot of situations, men can easily overpower a woman physically in those and they use that power to hurt a woman because they want fear or they take their anger out that way. Some feel empowered beating up what is defenseless and that itself is wrong. Violence isn't the right way regardless of gender. I think with self-defense, the amount of force you put info it should be proportionate to the situation. Like, if you can help it, why use excessive force if your life isn't in danger?
I agree with the fact that man should not take out their anger on a woman. I don't see why his problems has to be taken out on her. But I don't agree with the fact that she can just put her hands on a man and if he retaliates, he's the one that gets in trouble for it. Like I can't believe that some ppl say even if she gave you a busted lip or a broken nose or a black eye or all three, you still don't have a right to hit her back. I just believe everyone, regardless of gender, age, or race, has every right in their free will to defend themselves.