COUPLES vs SINGLES

Discussion in 'Wars' started by Babyrose, Jun 27, 2014.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Great post?
    Will_Strip_For_Bacon
    2.2mcs

    I_Friendzoned_Jesus
    1.1mcs

    Couples side
     
  2. Bump bump! I'm single side too
     
  3. Triple post inc?
    Willl_Strip_For_Bacon
    1.36mcs Strength
    660kcs Intel
    Timezone; GMT

    I_Friendzoned_Jesus
    543kcs Strength
    543kcs Intel
    Timezone; EST

    3rd time lucky eh??
     
  4. ^ Couples side for us

    (Good lordddd)
     
  5. 1.28mcs/1.15mcs

    Singles side 
     
  6. updating am on pg.3

    -CareBear_Crystal-Sparrow- CT
    645k / 501k

    Cubes ? PDT
    388k / 307k
     
  7. Im switching from single to couple side,

    _JTK__Ise_
    Str: 1424400
    Int: 854000
    SGT

    -_Jason_RednBlack-_-Darkness_-
    Str: 1459200
    Int: 870400
    SGT

    Couple side
     
  8. -_Jason_RednBlack-_-Darkness_-
    Str: 1459200
    Int: 870400
    SGT

    _JTK__Ise_
    Str: 1424400
    Int: 854000
    SGT

    Couple side
     
  9. 13 hours left ...
     
  10. i sign up my alt

    Couples side ty ;) lol
     
  11. Just recently became single, planning to stay that way for awhile to heal
     
  12. xjam
    1.23m/861,600

    Singles
     
  13. 1.71m str
    1.05m intel

    Sorry forgot that part
     
  14. When's the rooster coming out
     
  15. Solis-_-alex
    Strength 1,584,000
    Intel 259,200
    Single
     
  16. Look_Thee_ArchAngel

    Strength: 829,730
    Intelligence: 862,942
    Timezone: Mountain time
    Singles
     
  17. Username-Yash_Hastak_
    Strength-200,560
    Intelligence-200,560
    Relationship Status-Single
    Want to join this war
     
  18. @ Yash please read our instruction before submitting your registration! Thanks for your cooperation!
    6 hours left... Where are the couples... and singles?
     
  19. New update:
    Kracie
    1.42mcs/1.29mcs
    Single side

    Upgraded due to the closed range of bos war
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.