because 1v1 and then it's over no more disagreement. Why not 1v1? Not childish to 1v1 that's solving shit
I agree Wallace.. he's not a man of his word by saying" ill lcbc and strip u clean" I have yet to see either happen
I said 400b so he would shut his mouth in cc which it actually worked till he wasn't man enough to wall me and has to bring more drama to the forms till you man up and wall me and argue on me wall, I'm out
Time out.. In order to be a man, you have to argue on your target's wall? Am I missing something? If anything he's a man for bringing it to the forums. You can receive a lot of hate here.
I was just going to say that same thing. Kyle can't handle people agreeing with OP, so wants to have the "argument" on his wall, so he doesn't have to read everyone say how ridiculous he is for hitting over someone hiring a UP tut. You were fine having it on the forum when the first 10 or so dumb ass people decided to hate on the OP, but as soon as people point out how you have no logic behind your actions and it was ridiculous, you don't want to have it here anymore. Makes a lot of sense....
No, I clearly said I was going to volley her with her main and he said "I'm going to hire anyways" and everyone in cc was saying "why you being an ass? Can't you see he's using her for her main" like really this is all over something stupid, iv seen noobs fight better than this