Forumer has been a label that's been around for quite some time now. If you'd asked me in the past, I'd have told you it was the name given to the group of players who chose to dedicate their time to forums rather than play the game (especially in the time where volleying was the only way to make lots of money). If you'd ask me now, I'd tell you it's the people you see posting more than once or twice over a period of time. We get all sorts of people posting in this place now, whether it be people writing guides, people posting pictures everywhere or the people who just piss others off. True everyone has the power to post, or just lurk in forums. However I wouldn't consider any of them forumers unless they made a habit of it. As for legends, in the past thread I said something along the lines of "Many players (not all) cannot be called legends because they're still building their legacy". I saw someone else said that on the first page as well. However, to expand on that, I think it's hard to dictate what makes someone a legend. To me, actions make a legend. Not requirements. However... Those actions are debatable... There are so many factors that could be a part of why someone could or couldn't be considered legendary that I really think its a case-by-case title.
Good answer on both! Ill admit I'm iffy on the whole forumer thing. But that post was fantastic. I can say agree with that all.