OK guys, I know that some of you might think this petty, but I am open to any arguments about this. The real ideas to prove something is by the simple arguments. So let the arguments begin. But first, let me just give some information about the topic. Plasma is a state of matter of which has many ionized particles, a superheated gas to the point of physical manifestation, such as lightning. NOW FOR THE QUESTION [/color=red] IS FIRE REALLY A PLASMA? [/color]
I only did Chemistry until 10th grade... but I believe. Yes. It is. Because it isn't a gas or a liquid or superliquid or solid or bose einstein condensate... So it's plasma.
The major difference between gas and plasma is that in a plasma a fair fraction of the atoms are ionized. The gas is so hot, and the atoms are moving around so quick and in a rapid motion, if the electrons were given enough energy they could leave their atom for a while. A game changing effect is that plasma gains some electrical properties that a non-ionized gas doesn’t have. Plasma will become conductive, also it will react to magnetic and electrical fields. This is one of the easiest test to see if something is plasma or not. Fire ticks all the boxes to be a plasma, however, it isn't the best plasma or the most ionised but it really is a plasma.
I agree with you guys, fire is a state of plasma, I may not have much knowhow about it, but I believe fire is a plasma
Where the hell were you guys when I was in highschool? . Good thing this shit is irrelevant in Business Administration classes lol.