Incorrectly banned from chatting

Discussion in 'Questions/Feedback' started by renamed35129, Feb 23, 2024.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. How is it im given a banner, post it and get silenced claiming I solicitednunder 17. This was incorrect. It was 17+ as stated in the banner. Seems they have some work to do on spotting a + sign
     
  2. I don't think the + sign is the issue. 17 is considered underage, even though they can still play (for some reason), it's pretty sus, especially on Pimd.

    I'd change the banner to 18+ or even 21+.

    69+ ftw.
     
    Muschi likes this.
  3. It statedni was soliciting for those under the age of 17. I was given the banner by the leader of the club. It states in the statement that I was soliciting those UNDER 17. Yet I have the banner showing the truth
     
  4. I find it incorrect and filed an appeal based on the rules. I am well aware that those under 17 are not allowed. The club leader is 17, and as a result she changed the rules which resulted in the issue. I do have the banner as proof that at no time did I solicite anyone under 17. I'm not that stupid
     
  5. Possibly consider that someone under 18, per the ATA rules, should not be owning and promoting a dirty rp club at all?
     
    Muschi likes this.
  6. Considering you’re in a dirty rp club the rules are 18+ as that’s the legal age of consent, 17 isn’t legal.
    So yes, in terms of posting a banner advertising sexually explicit roleplay to those under the age of 18 I would have silenced for the same thing too. Unfortunately there isn’t an under 18 solicitation we have to chose the one that best matches hope that clears things up.
     
    Muschi and V_Witchy_101 like this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.