Global Warming.

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by Royale_Kaname_Will_Never_Die, Sep 10, 2014.

  1. How about you pay more attention about that?
    Google your own research.

    Said enough.
     
  2. We cant! Were to busy partying for these ugly ass avatars
     
  3. too lazy to google
     
  4. Op why not u just Google yourself?
     
  5. Did you know while Algore was doing a campain on GW he was complaining how it was so hot in the building and how there all sweating, he didnt turn the A/C on. They say they found a man millions years old under 20ft of ice! How did he get there? The Earths tempeture always changes, GW is a bunch of bull shit.
     
  6. Research shows surprise global warming
    'hiatus' could have been forecast
    Australian and US climate experts say with new ocean-based
    modelling tools, the early 2000s warming slowdown was
    foreseeable
    An iceberg melts in Kulusuk, Greenland. Scientists say recent
    climate modelling techniques focusing on oceans could have
    predicted the surprise global warming slowdown in the early 2000s.
    Photograph: John McConnico/AP
    Tags: Climate change , Australia , Victoria
    Melissa Davey
    Monday 8 September 2014 23.40 EDT
    Australian and US researchers have shown that the slowdown in
    the rate of global warming in the early 2000s, known as a so-
    called “global warming hiatus”, could have been predicted if
    today’s tools for decade-by-decade climate forecasting had been
    available in the 1990s.
    Although global temperatures remain close to record highs, they
    have shown little warming trend over the past 15 years, a
    slowdown that earlier climate models had been largely unable to
    predict.
    This has been used by climate change sceptics as evidence that
    climate change prediction models are flawed.
    Gerald Meehl, a senior scientist at the National Centre for
    Atmospheric Research in the US, along with the Centre for
    Australian Weather and Climate Research in Melbourne, decided
    to challenge the assumption that no climate model could have
    foreseen the hiatus.
    “We wanted to know: if we could be transported back to the 1990s
    with new decadal prediction capability, a set of current models
    and a modern-day supercomputer, could we simulate the hiatus?”
    Meehl said.
    Studies have shown global warming had not stalled but was
    occurring in the deeper layers of the world’s oceans instead of the
    surface, he said, which were absorbing the heat and obscuring
    levels of warming. In other words the “pause” was actually a
    slight slowing of the rate of increase in surface temperatures, with
    93% of the extra heat trapped in the oceans.
    Decadal climate prediction uses the state of the world’s oceans
    and their influence on the atmosphere to predict how global
    climate will evolve over the next few years.
    It is a relatively new area of climate science driven by
    supercomputing, increased sophistication of global models and the
    availability of higher-quality observations of the climate system,
    particularly the ocean.
    When Meehl and his team applied these decadal climate
    prediction models to past-observed conditions in the climate
    system starting in the late 1990s, the three-to-seven-year
    forecasts consistently simulated the leveling of global temperature
    that was observed after the year 2000.
    While Meehl said all the factors that might be driving the hiatus
    were still being studied, his research, published in the journal
    Nature Climate Change , suggested natural decade-to-decade
    climate variability was largely responsible.
    “Because this is a brand new way of doing predictions we need to
    be careful as to how reliable these predictions are,” he said. “But
    there are indications from some of the most recent model
    simulations that the hiatus could end in the next few years.”
    Professor Matthew England, the deputy director of the climate
    change research centre at the University of New South Wales, said
    the study was important because it revealed initialised climate
    models could have predicted the recent slowdown in surface
    atmospheric warming.
    “This gives us confidence in the skill of these models for longer-
    term climate projections, as they appear to be able to capture the
    interplay between decadal variability and long-term warming,” he
    said
    “Like a weather prediction system, the models just need
    appropriate initial conditions, and then their skill on the decadal
    time-scale comes through.”
     
  7. ....We're too lazy. We're partying our asses off for these avatars.
     
  8. @Kyle*

    Dude yes the Earth climate change too, but it take 1000years even more,
    Not 10-20 years.
     
  9. I'm just copied it. Doesn't mean that I...
     
  10. Somebody told me that the Earth naturally heats up and cools down and that after the ice caps (I think thats the name :roll: ) melt there will probably be another ice age again lol.
     
  11. I heard that if the north pole ice melts, it'll fuck the sea temperature flowing system and the whole Europe will become an Ice continent.
     
  12. i love ice age,the movie
     
  13. But now it's the turn to heat... and when it will be cool down again?
     
  14. I live in Europe :roll: