You also have to look at the studies to see if they were conducted in a biased way or not, whether they were trying to disprove or prove their hypothesis
I’m not going to depth on the research I did in your msg thread. You can likely find it again if you want. The FDA says “generally” for a reason. If you look at other Associations (which I listed in your thread multiple times) such as the American Heart Association, you can clearly see that Americans consume too much sodium, one of the common (due to it being hidden/not having to be labeled as msg) sources of it being msg, which you can find said in many places. I go to google and google scholar to find reliable resources, like from multiple studies, not just one that works in my favor, and organizations, etc. I don’t care what world you lived in, we’re talking about now. Things aren’t the same as they used to be, you can’t use the same knowledge and studies from “the world before”, the internet is there to help and give us relevant, new data.
That’s why I personally look for multiple. Ones that could prove and disprove, and ones with small and large amounts of people. There’s plenty of studies on so many topics that have so many different variables, it’d be silly to rely on one or two. ?
Any study conducted to find something that affects the mass populace but conducted in less than 5 areas and less than 50 people aren’t trustworthy
Ok good, because today we have idiots who will hear places like buzzfeed say something and that makes it true even though it’s a company of Anti-whites