Im talking about arguments that have been simply stopped, not talked out. I also said “etc” because I wasn’t going to type out every outcome. I can be wrong, I know that.
My opinions are always based off facts, just sometimes they're to complex for your broken brain to understand. I'm glad you found someone as mentally ill as yourself, although please don't reproduce. We need less crazy in the world, not more. And no, you've never provided actual facts to back up your crazy rants. You provide sources as crazy as yourself, if you haven't noticed literally no one including myself has ever replied about one of your sources in a positive manner. Even people who were on your side of an argument drop out when you start pulling out your silly articles. I love God, I love my country, I'm useful, I cook and clean and provide for my family. I'm awesome! The world needs more people like me. Hence I reproduce and you do not.
Oh, and I definitely stop arguing with you about things because you are crazy. Your brain is broken and will never be able to follow a logical argument. So why bother? It's fun for awhile, but when it's no longer fun to string you along I just call it a day. There will be something to prove you wrong about again tomorrow. There always is
I mean, when we talked about MSG, it was pretty clear that I was basing everything I said off of fact. Your way of pushing things away with “no these people are crazy so I won’t listen to the fact they have phds and studies!” is what’s crazy. Let’s also bring in the Muslim new year mess. A majority of things said there were based off of opinion. Everyone’s opinions were based off of a situation that had happened, but they were opinions we formed from our emotions and influences, not from facts and studies. Go ahead and try to keep acting like you calling everything crazy is you being right, because that’s simply not true. We are influenced by emotions and surroundings, not always fact. Face it ??♀️
:roll: you're still wrong on all those topics too. You can provide sources that say vaccines cause autism. Does that make those correct too? Your brain is missing the part where you look at both sides before forming an opinion. You just jump to whichever side your emotions do then cherry pick things that back up your opinion. That's not basing an opinion on fact, that's cherry picking facts to support your opinion. Very different.
See, this is where I say you don’t know me nor the way I research. I’ll always look at both sides, I don’t do well with embarrassment of being wrong, though I’ll own up if I’m proven wrong. For instance, at first I was wary about contributing to the MSG argument, I had studied it but I didn’t know my opinion on it for sure. So I looked into it a bit, saw more evidence and recent studies to the side I was leaning towards, and ran with that. If you look up a question, you will get results (depending on the topic ofc!) almost every time of any sides there are. I’ll look over multiple before forming an argument, you however seem to run with your first statement or opinion and never look back. When you begin providing studies and books and websites created by individuals with extensive study in a field, then you can talk about who’s cherry picking
Wait what? Are you saying someone actually believed that vaccines cause autism? God I want to die now
You just described confirmation bias, which is exactly what I accused you of earlier. I don't need to research everything before forming an opinion. I've lived a lot longer than you, I've seen the results of many many circumstances and situations play out in life. Sure if you Google something you'll find an answer, but is the first stuff to pop up on a search engine the right answer? Nah...not always. It's just about who's best at managing SEOs. For example, my dumbãss old boss was great at managing SEOs, he could always make his company show up 1st on Google. Does that make him the best? The most reputable? Nahhhhhhh far from it. He is just really good at marketing his companies and his ideas.
Confirmation bias =/= having an idea of what something is and further researching and seeing that the idea you had has been confirmed by studies, or disproved. I’m open to hearing all sides, and I will admit I am wrong or that there could be other options if shown the proof. I also didn’t say the first thing that pops up in a search engine is what you should go with, I was more so trying to get at that google will give you many results if you do not put a bias into the search, and you also have things like google scholar that can be a great help too and use keywords, not possible ads and such. “I don’t need to research before forming an opinion” is silly if you’re going to attempt a debate of any kind. If it’s something that can be an opinion based on feelings/surroundings alone, sure, go ahead, but if you’re actually going to debate a topic, let’s say MSG again, then research is necessary in order to see if, say, studies have been done recently that prove your side right or wrong.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has classified MSG as a food ingredient that's "generally recognized as safe," Right, I have no idea what I'm talking about blah blah blah, you ramble like a crazy person. Oh wait, you are one. Wanna know if a foods safe? You ask the FDA not the vast sea of inaccurate studies. This is exactly what I'm talking about, you don't know where to look for accurate information. You wanna spend your time filling your head with pages of Google results go ahead. I don't have to, I know who provides accurate information. I lived in the world before we all had computers in our homes and our pockets. I'm also competely sane and happy, whereas you are not. Perhaps you should take a page out of my book, kid.