open question

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by -Just_A_Noob-2, Sep 18, 2016.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. don't invite if there no Kitty lol
     
  2. Duh
     
  3. They're adding new staff, yet I see more and more people breaking TOU in WC and nothing is being done, but I do hear more and more people complaining getting silenced for exposing scammers, that isn't normal.
    I can call out a girl that is scamming, she even confirmed it on her own wall and in WC, yet I'm sure I'll get silenced for it.
     


  4. Other people cannot verify the information of you calling out the scammer, which means they cannot see the SS, which would then mean that you will share 3rd party informations with others in order to show them your SS, sharing 3Rd party info is against ToU.

    My issue is that rule is that ATA asked its users to like their Facebook and other media pages and to write a message on their wall with their username which break ToU rule itself, they're sharing their 3RD party info... Blah 7am still asleep enjoy
     
  5. If they brought in a trading system where both players agree first item lock and sent once done. Want get scammers they won't let us warn other players but yet don't bring nothing out to help stop it either
     
  6. They could have a market where sellers put their items and expected price and buyers put their requirement.

    But then this is just a game so stop whining about losing items on a game
     
  7. Say you give a dvp in trade for giftable item/items..

    Is it scamming if you choose to farm the dvp back from the player that overpriced said useless pixel items?
     
  8. ^ exactly , so many questions
    no clear definition of scamming and no clear idea what they will make with the scammers when receiveing enough evidence
     
  9. How would a screen shot even be evidence it seems more like a he-said she-said kinda thing. You cant prove someone's intentions in a screen shot.

    :cry: they need a trading system even though ATA keeps saying why they won't do it it's a stupid reason.
     
  10. They could just throw away the old tutor/pupil/volley/bump/my tut/your tut part of the game.. and implement item trading instead ;)
     
  11. Do you not want them to make a regulatory body to control prices and thereby inflation?
     
  12. Wut
     
  13. ban scammers for life, 20 dollas to reactivate account though. ata this is top money opportunity. make it happen!!!
     
  14. No support. That idea is silly what the point of there even being a ban if they can pay their way back into the game. Everyone would just do it then, and then the game will be 100% more corrupt than it already is
     
  15. i think this is way too much
     
  16. If ata cared about scammers they would have a trade function.
    But since they don't have that function of course they don't care.
    The items YOU get as REWARDS for YOUR efforts
     
  17. Are not meant to be traded.
    Don't run to ata and cry because of your own stupidity.
    How not to be scammed: DONT TRADE. You know the risks.
     
  18. How not to get rekt: shut your pie hole
     
  19. Oh look another opinion people didn't ask for and are not gonna care about ️
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.