I can pull stats, and correctly interpret them, from any country. You need to make your point more succinctly - as your argument is all over the place.
The women CEOs delivered a higher return than their male counter parts, and yet were remunerated less. Hence why there is a corporate governance drive to have more female board members. And that's not driven my feminists with hairy armpits - but investors who want better returns
Even when men and women are performing the EXACT same job, the pay gap still doesn't disappear. Here's some American statistics for you.
The point about the countries is all countries have vastly different economies and cultures. Fallen that is a legitimate statistic, probably the first I've seen on this board. Bit unrelated but according to statistics from nemko and the census bureau, unmarried women make 14% more than unmarried men. Men and women will never make equal wages unless pays are regulated to the cent for every job.
So it's alright to make the victim of a rape pay for a child they didn't want? Just because she can get pregnant and have the control of whether it's kept. that makes the victim automatically wrong?
I honestly think your missing the point here. So you believe that when a man rapes a woman and she decides to keep the baby....he shouldnt have to pay child support? Where is the logic in that?
your missing my point, my point was that if you were to read the original post that my original response is too, there was no room to even imagine that the man could be the victim
The original statement he quoted was from the perspective that the man was a victim of sexual abuse, and he took that too such a twisted perspective,removing that possibility entirely.