Woah, a bcs member.. going to …sf someone? oh god, tell me who is first so I can watch their DANCE wins/losses go up.
FYI I've sf many before just because I have a tag doesn't really mean much BCs have there ways and I have my ways and as u can tell my stats are not lcbc though I've been playing for ages it's cause I'm still relying on old ways and don't want to be spoon feeded
There is two things I would like to point out that hasn't been on page one, and I haven't yet read the other pages. Point number 1) what about those who're pinned straight from the start and have no time to even get one successful hit? And don't have doctor notes? Hmm? Point number 2) with out inactive's, your active hitters would be hit, meaning you won't be able to plunder as much because of being hit and weaken by the opposite side. Inactive's are a win/loss Yes they may leak, but they take the heat away from your active hitters so they can make their inactive's leak. Both sides have them.
yeah I couldn't get a hit in for in over 45 mins. Was really fun tho and can't believe the difference was 100m. Kind of like old time wars just less time. Definitely will be warring as often as I can with this wars. And people do have to consider time differences and all that. Plus like it's been pointed out RL takes priority. In all wars it's all down to team work and how well people listen. ATA is will always be in a no win situation.
I agree ppl on losing side should lose -20 candies for not hitting and costing ppl the war not to mention ruining it for others Ppl on winning side should lose -60 since they just ride on the efforts of others Additionally I think ppl who constantly do this should be sf Ofcourse I'm talking about no hits, I believe the same is being done in Kaw if u don't hit ur sf(someone correct me if I'm wrong)
Well having 1/4 of a club inactive dosent take the heat off actives cuz they pinned ours fast leaving no one to hit how does that help?…