I honestly think it is non of our business. Let people solve their own issues in their own countries. Who comes to the US and "help" us or "get involve" unless asked!? Umm no one. So why go start a war trying to help when you might end up hurting more people than helping them? Cause I'm sure as soon as we attack Other people will be on us and you start a war you could've avoided. It is not the US business what issues syria is having. I know people are dying but why are we the first one to want to rush and be rescuer? I really don't think we need this right now. There's so much going on in here alone. (Plus I want this over with. I want to see other news on TV) This is my personal opinion. Please do not burst if you feel differently.
will obama should blow them up cause no one does not wont to die so people didnt finish there life cause all of this no one dont wont to die
Lol, sorry 99 problems. And iyonna, I'm not really sure what your saying.-. Bootiful has a point, and Brandon, I don't know. I probably shouldn't have made this forum, but it's out here now.
War is needed in certain situations. Back in WW2 the US was staying out of it until Japan bombed Pearl Harbor. Hence then the US bombed back but with a nuclear attack, they werent just going to sit there and try to talk "peacefully".
I was just proving your point "War is never needed" wrong. I think the US should give it a little more time and see what comes up before striking first.
As I mentioned in last thread... There are strategies that all countries follow, the strategies have no interest of being kind to ppl, the other countries just want to capture the land becoz of the country like Syria's weakness like Civil war and interior matters... If Syria's government did not get in better conditions with their civilians. The government will lose their hands off their country, bring war and all countries will get involved in the war and that's how they get in the ass
Lets put it this way. If the United States paid half the attention to our country instead of others then we wouldn't be fucked over right now in a recession. Simple as that. Yes, chemical warfare is a dangerous and scary thing. I have a feeling that if we get involved in this civil war then there will be a WW3 only this time in the Middle East. We should just keep our noses out and not step in. That would leave us less enemies than if we stepped in. We've "warred" against Russia once and there technology was progressing very good so we barely managed to win the so called Cold War. We piss Russia off again by messing with their ally then there is no telling what will happen. Along with China, they fuel our economy with their goods. They hate us, our economy starts to cripple. During our Civil War did you see any Middle Eastern people stepping in to help us? Yeah, me neither. Let them solve it themselves.
Kun is right. Their issue should be solved internally. It's the responsibility if the US to solve other people's problems. I'm against this war mainly because my Sister is Navy and assigned to a carrier ship meaning her ship could possible be one to carry out the attack aircrafts. Even if moving forward more thought need to be put into this plan because you can't just bomb a country and expect them not to attack back.
This is more than an u.s getting involved issue. Syria using chemical weapons is deemed as"war crimes an crimes againat humanity." And the U.N has people looking into it. No american boots would be on the ground. Just bombings. Not opinion just a lil info on it
Um, once that bomb touches the ground you best believe we gonna have Iran and Russian boots up our butts.-.
I think USA don't have any rights to hit Syrian government and if they did they r hitting the Syrian ppl not just the government and we hope USA and Obama mind there own business and Leave Arabian world and ppl out of there heads and it's not there frecking business for goodness sake
I think when a country has a million ppl leave it and become refugees living in tents and you have a government who is quite willing to launch chemical weapons at its own ppl it becomes a issue for the world if countries like that don't want external interference maybe they should start by not killing there own citizens
Are you guys serious? If the US attacks Syria they won't attack the people, they'll attack places where guns are stored or soldiers are trained, they won't attack a random building