Can you win?

Discussion in 'Off Topic' started by 00_Eli, Apr 25, 2013.

  1. The immovable object. Since it is immovable, any amount of force acting on it would be less than its potential friction, so the unstoppable force wouldn't move the object. The force would still act on the object, it just wouldn't move it.
     
  2. As I said it is a paradox. Neither one could destroy each other as it would be a non stop battle since both are to be indestructible, so one does not over power the other to so called be stronger.
     
  3. IMMOVEABLE OBJECTS DO NOT EXIST BECAUSE MOVEMENT IS THE PERSPECTIVE OF PERCEPTION!!
     
  4. Let's be honest.

    I'm the unstoppable force 
     
  5. Justin you're so full of yourself
     
  6. Immoveable =/= Not moving
     
  7. No one is saying they do exist, its just a question that tickles your brain. Dont be so literal about everything. Another possible answer is that the force would just disappear, or tjat force would go THROUGHthe object because its unmovable, not unbreakable.
     
  8. The Answer is God! Because he is both
     
  9. Tell you what. I won't give anybody the dv, but everyone will get a ring on this thread.

    If you want the answer, which is accessible on a 3rd party app, please pm me so I can enlighten you. 
     
  10. A Christian shows up to a physics debate... I'm out. 
     
  11. Thats poop. I won!
     
  12. Nobody here reads Asimov? 
     
  13. Reading is so overrated 
     
  14. I can destroy both with one of my lethal farts
     
  15. that's what i do when i have no idea
     
  16. You post multiple times in rapid succession?
     
  17. Rapid  Ive heard foot described that way before.
     
  18. They are the same strength
     
  19. It destroys it 
     
  20. I thought the twin towers were unmoveable. But I was wrong. And the plane was the force. The unstoppable force won.