They're not false accusations. I just refuse to show the screen shots to anyone but the accused and ATA. I refuse to give her name out because I dont want anyone to look at her differently.
Hmmm but if this was 4 months ago she may not even know why you're following her; people follow mods all the time. She may not even remember what happened.
Yes scooter. But since no name was given, then she can't be silenced for it. Mods don't just follow people willy-nilly. Otherwise they would have thousands of followers and their inbox would be cluttered.
A grudge... With someone you do not personally know at all from probably the other side of earth.. through an online application on your iDevice.. SEEMS LEGIT
They have to be investigated to be declared false But I guess. The TOU is vague in several areas which need to be updated but never have been. I never knew that saying on your status "This account has been silenced for violation of (different reason" was silencable until a mod gave me a warning and cleared my status.
But yes, your logic behind posting this thread and withholding information proving your case or even making your opinion appear valid, does not make a lick of sense.
I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that she read this thread. I can just about be sure she was having a bad day. If she'll talk to me, in private, and let me know if I rubbed her the wrong way or if she was in a bad mood, I will create another thread publicly apologizing and will also apologize in WC.
So you'll create a random thread apologizing to a mystery mod for accusing them on another thread because they were having a bad day? How do you know she read your thread? I am getting confused