Hey everyone I wanted to make this thread about my opinion and yours about "Locked Roster" Wars. To me, wars were better with no locked roster because it would make things more interesting. For example: You could recruit "Mercs" to help win, and it would give you more money to upgrade. But now with locked roster wars, you can only recruit before the war happens. Many people only join during the war, but can't after a locked roster war starts. When I want to join a war that is in progress, it is usually locked roster which makes me sad . If people would advertise on campus that they are having a locked roster war, maybe they would get mercs. I rarely see a post about a locked roster war coming up. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Hope you enjoy this thread, post your opinions and if u agree or disagree with me and I am planning on making more threads like this.
I agree it's annoying as I've started my own club with a friend and we're trying to build it up with u all the way
I started a club with a friend and and find it difficult to recruit members but can't with a locked roster rule so I agree with u all the way
Fine then I believe that if people ask nicely not to be farmed, the farmer should stop, but like if they did something to make them angry or something, they have every right to farm
I don't understand why everybody's against them. They're great for having a fair war. Before, when a war happened if you agreed to no mercs, the person could break their promise and just bring them in anyway. (I've seen this happen many times) this could cause a team who was winning fairly to end up losing, just because the other team had more connections. This is clearly unfair.
Block, I see your way. Open wars give more opportunities to get more money to upgrade and get better stats.